Snyder v. Schardt
Hamilton Circuit Court
ERROR to Hamilton common pleas court.
1Opinion of the Court
GIFFEN, J..The special finding of the jury, which is sustained by tin- evidence, supports the general verdict in favor of the plaintiff upon the first cause of action, and hence it is immaterial whether the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the second cause of action,
■ If, however, the plaintiff before the request was made by the defendant, had already agreed with the adjoining lot jwner to do and perform the same work for a valuable consideration, the promise of the defendant to pay therefor, whether expressed or implied, would be without consideration.
It would be no detriment to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railway Co. v. MorleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Putnam v. WoodburySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878