Legal Opinion

Bogert v. Vermilya

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the supreme court. The case is fully stated in the following opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The plaintiff declared in assumpsit against the defendant (whom in the commencement of the declaration he styles “ the survivor of William Bruce ”) upon the money counts ; the indebtedness and promises being stated as of “the defendant,” without any addition of special character. To the declaration was annexed a copy of a joint and several promissory note, dated January 21,1837, at three months, for $200 with interest, and made by Wm. Bruce and the defendant. The defendant pleaded the general issue and that the action did not accrue to the plaintiff at any time within six years next before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. DelafieldCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Christopher v. StockholmNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. People v. HaddockNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Moulton's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In re the Application for Letters of Administration on the Estate of ReichertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1901
  3. In re CuttingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API