Legal Opinion

McCully v. O'Connor

California Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1896No. L. A. No. 145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San' Deigo County. W. L. Pierce, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This action was brought February 9, 1895, to recover from the defendant, receiver of the Consolidated National Bank of San Diego, upon certificate of deposit No. 17,896, dated April 2, 1892, for eight thousand dollars, payable to the order of James L. Mason upon which certain payments had been made, leaving a *265balance of six thousand one hundred and sixty-eight dollars and ninety cents as principal and interest. Also to recover the sum of eighteen hundred and forty-one dollars and twenty-four cents due said Mason on an open account.

The court below gave judgment in favor of the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rawitzer v. First Trust Co. of OmahaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API