Legal Opinion

United States v. David Rainey

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2014No. 13-30770PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:

Distilled, this appeal raises a pure question of statutory interpretation. Congress criminalizes obstructing “the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress.” 18 U.S.C. § 1505. The defendant contends, and the district court agreed, that he cannot be prosecuted under § 1505 for obstructing a congressional-subcommittee investigation because a congressional subcommittee is not “any committee of either House.” We interpret the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth FairleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Jimmy Shinn v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  3. United States v. Tamny WestbrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. CabelloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  5. Seago v. O'MalleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API