Legal Opinion

Savolaine v. Matthew Leivo & Sons

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1938No. Appeal, 129PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

John Savolaine, the claimant, received a serious injury of his left foot while in the course of his employment as a hod carrier. On November 6, 1931, an open agreement for an indefinite number of weeks was entered into, under which claimant was paid $15 per week. A second petition was filed on January 25, 1934, for a modification of tjhe agreement. The referee, after a hearing, found that the claimant had suffered the permanent loss of the use of his left foot for industrial purposes, and made an order in accordance with the provisions of section 306(e) of the Workmen’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manley v. Lycoming Motors Corp., Etc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Kerwin v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Melini v. Saltslburg Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Zuro v. McClintic Marshall Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Sharcheck v. Beaver Run Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Morrow v. James S. Murray & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Lako v. SCHLESSINGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Flood v. Logan Iron & Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Mahoney v. Francis Mulholland Roofing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API