Legal Opinion

Paris v. C. B. Fleet Holding Co.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 22, 2008No. C.A. Nos. K.C. 07-0506, P.C. 07-3028, P.C. 07-3029Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before the Court are consolidated Motions to Dismiss (Motions) filed by the Defendants C.B. Fleet Holding Company, C.B. Fleet Company, Inc., CVS, Inc., and Brooks Pharmacy, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants") in actions brought by Nora and Ronald Paris, Myrna and Arthur Freedman, and Howard Crowell (collectively, "Plaintiffs").1 Defendants argue that dismissal of these claims is required by the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The Plaintiffs have filed an objection. Jurisdiction is pursuant to G.L. 1956 §8-2-14(a).2

I

Facts and Travel

Plaintiffs Nora and Ronald Paris are residents of New…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Iragorri v. International Elevator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Francis Schertenleib v. Jerome S. TraumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. George E. Mercier v. Sheraton International, Inc., A/k/a, Itt-Sheraton International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API