Legal Opinion
Great Northern Railway Co. v. State
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1928No. Nos. 21092, 21093. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
These two cases on appeal, being substantially alike, were treated by the parties as one case. The actions are brought by respondents to recover certain corporation excise taxes paid to the state pursuant to provisions of ch. 149, Laws of 1925, Ex. Ses., p. 418; Rem. 1927 Sup., § 3841 (amending Rem. Comp. Stat., § 3841), § 3 of which chapter reads:
‘ ‘ Sec. 3. That section 3841 of Remington’s Compiled Statutes, as amended by section 4, chapter 144, Session Laws of 1923, be amended to read as follows:
“Section 3841. Every corporation incorporated under the laws of this state, and every foreign…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Southern Railway Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
- Chicago, M., St. P. &. P. R. v. HedgesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1933
- State v. Azel Meadows Realty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. DenneyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. Borden Co. v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.