Legal Opinion

Duran v. Rinehart

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Hardin District Court. — Hon. Robert M. Wright, Judge. One Rinehart, temporary guardian of Thos. Walker, who was found to be of unsound mind, filed his final report, and, the ward having died, a special administrator of his estate filed objections to the report of the temporary guardian. The objections were to specific claims filed with the guardian, and upon hearing the objections were sustained and the claims disallowed. . The guardian appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Deemer, O. J.

On March 26, 1906, J. M. Rinehart was appointed temporary guardian of the estate of Thomas Walker, after two trials before a jury upon the issue of Walker’s capacity to manage his estate. Before final judgment Avas rendered in the guardianship proceedings and on the ldth day of October, 1908, Walker died. It was found that he left a will, and O. McKeen Duran was appointed special administrator of his estate. Upon order of the court the temporary guardian made a report which was filed December 31, 1908. Notice of hearing was given, and the special administrator appeared and filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bates v. DunhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Slusher v. HammondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Curran v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ordway & Husted v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. In re the Estate of ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Gorden v. LuntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. In re Guardianship of DeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. In Re Guardianship of BarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API