Legal Opinion

In re Accounts of Steencken & Bolte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the petitioner, Herman Bolte, as surviving executor, etc., of Christian Koch (sometimes called Cook), deceased, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Hew York, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 8th day of October, 1900, which taxes, allows and awards a sum of money for disbursements to Anna Dieckmann, and directs that that amount, in.addi tion to ten dollars costs, be paid by the appellant as sole surviving executor.

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, J.:

On the 29th of December, 1899, an order was made by the Surrogate’s Court in this proceeding, which, on appeal to this court, was reversed, with costs. The present respondent thereupon moved to make the order of this court the order of the Surrogate’s Court, and such motion having been granted, a bill of costs and disbursements was noticed for taxation. This bill included, among other disbursements, .two items for printing — one, the case, and the other, the points on the appeal — aggregating eighty-four dollars and twenty-eight cents. The executor (the present appellant)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cassidy v. . McFarlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. LangeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
  2. In re the Estate of MoranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API