Pensacola State Bank v. Melton
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Action by the Pensacola State Bank against R. E. Melton and otlr; ers. On motion for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The plaintiff against which the verdict of the jury went has moved for a new trial, and has specified nine grounds upon which it seeks that relief. The ninth of these grounds is subdivided into eight other grounds. Laying aside for the present the first eight of the grounds urged, and which relate to questions of testimony, we will first dispose of the ninth ground and its subdivisions, all of which relate to the charge to the jury.
[1] 1. The plaintiff in its petition shows, and the fact is nowhere disputed, that the makers of the note sued on, on its face, made it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Mersman v. WergesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Limerick National Bank v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moody v. Morris-Roberts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Clapper v. GambleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Medeiros v. Fellsway Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951