Legal Opinion

Bonner and Eddy, Receivers v. Mayfield

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1891No. 3127PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Appellee while in the employment of appellants was injured through a defect in a culvert crossed by the railway then under the control of appellants as receivers, and this action was brought to recover damages for such injury. The evidence of the roadmaster and others shows clearly that the. culvert was not properly constructed and that the injury resulted from that fact, and it-further shows that those in charge of the road could not have been ignorant of the defect.

It is urged that the receivers were not liable for injury resulting from defects in the road existing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GeigerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bonner v. WingateTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bibby v. BibbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Moore v. OrgainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Robinson v. MillsMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Freeman v. FieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API