Pagan v. Holman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Plaintiff’s fourth and sixth amended complaints were dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state causes of action. Plaintiff declined to amend further, whereupon trial judge dismissed his actions with prejudice.
Plaintiff’s amended complaints were based upon the same occurrence — a collision on a through highway involving three vehicles. The relevant paragraphs of his complaints are identical.
Ignoring evidentiary matters, legal conclusions and other defects,1 the complaints allege negligence and proximate cause in language substantially as follows: Defendant-Swicord suddenly decreased…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blackman v. Miami Transit CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Gosma v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Haislet v. CrowleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Frisch v. KellyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Holmes v. SurfusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lynch v. TennysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Revellino v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Lubliner v. GabrilowitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981