Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Amaraneni
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 27, 1990No. 89-30PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The primary issue presented in this case is whether the facts showed that the defendants were avoiding service of process so that service by publication was authorized under Rule 4.3(c), A.R.Civ.P.
When the defendants failed to answer the plaintiffs' complaint, the court entered a default judgment against them. When the defendants became aware of the judgment, they filed a motion under Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., to set it aside. The court denied their motion and they appeal from that denial.
In August 1986, Ervin and Vibha Fisher, Dr. Ramiah Amaraneni, Bryan Leveritt, and Dr. Lakshmi Gaddam…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Raine v. First Western BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Wonder v. Southbound Records, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Trueblood v. Grayson Shops of Tennessee, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1963
- Coosa Marble Co., Inc. v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- McBrayer v. Hokes Bluff Auto PartsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Nichols v. PateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- M.G. v. J.T.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Parsons Steel, Inc. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.