McGilvary v. Reynolds

The appeal in this case is from a decree of the .circuit court sustaining the general demurrer of the defendants that “there is no equity in said bill,” and dismissing the same.

AYhile the hill is meager in its averments and singularly wanting in clearness and accuracy in statement, and for this reason is subject to specific grounds of demurrer, it was not subject to the general demurrer for want of equity. Seeberg v. Norville et al., 204 Ala. 20, 85 So. 505; McDuffie v. Lynchburg Shoe Co., 178 Ala. 271, 59 So. 567.

The allegations of the bill are, to state their substance, that Jay Reynolds…