Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Curtis v. Jennings

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rodenbeck, J.:

There is nothing in the papers to raise an issue as to the jurisdiction and power of the court before which relator was convicted and the questions raised by statements of facts in his petition go to the regularity of the proceedings and are reviewable only by appeal. The writ of habeas corpus cannot be resorted to to try out the legality and justice of a conviction if the court had jurisdiction and power to render the judgment. “ No inquiry into the ‘ legality or justice ’ of any mandate is permitted, except as those terms include questions of jurisdiction or power.” (People ex…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Farrington v. . MenschingNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. People Ex Rel. Danziger v. Protestant Episcopal House of MercyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. People ex rel. Curtis v. KidneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. People ex rel. Lazarus v. Protestant Episcopal House of MercyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Robarge v. WalrathNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API