Pryatel v. Doe (In Re Doe)
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Crothers, Justice.
[¶1] Jane Doe appeals from a district court order continuing her treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital. The district court found Jane Doe mentally ill, a person requiring treatment, and that no alternative treatment was appropriate. We conclude under our standard of review that the finding Jane Doe is a mentally ill person requiring treatment is not clearly erroneous. The district court's order is affirmed.
I
[¶2] In July 2017 the North Dakota State Hospital petitioned for involuntary hospitalization of Jane Doe after police took her into custody for lying on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M.K. v. J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- North Dakota State Hospital v. D.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- In the Interest of J.A.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Eckroth v. B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Interest of B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shukri Hassan v. William McManusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Interest of A.M.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Interest of B.L.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Interest of D.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Interest of R.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.