Legal Opinion

Pryatel v. Doe (In Re Doe)

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2019No. 20180409PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶1] Jane Doe appeals from a district court order continuing her treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital. The district court found Jane Doe mentally ill, a person requiring treatment, and that no alternative treatment was appropriate. We conclude under our standard of review that the finding Jane Doe is a mentally ill person requiring treatment is not clearly erroneous. The district court's order is affirmed.

I

[¶2] In July 2017 the North Dakota State Hospital petitioned for involuntary hospitalization of Jane Doe after police took her into custody for lying on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. M.K. v. J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. North Dakota State Hospital v. D.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In the Interest of J.A.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Eckroth v. B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Interest of B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shukri Hassan v. William McManusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Interest of A.M.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Interest of B.L.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Interest of D.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Interest of R.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API