Legal Opinion

People v. Valentine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), dated January 10, 2003, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not denied effective assistance of counsel at the hearing, conducted pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, which resulted in his designation as a level three sex offender (see generally People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]; People…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Vandover v. CzajkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. People v. BottistiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. ArotinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API