Legal Opinion

Deffler v. Loudenback

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 11, 1924No. Gen. No. 28,548PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff as payee of a promissory note dated March 19, 1914, for $2,500.00 due on or before one year after date with interest until due at 6 per cent and after-wards at 7 per cent made by W. E. Deffler brought an action of assumpsit against the defendant as indorser of the note, claiming that there was a balance due and unpaid of $2,525.64. The case was tried before a judge and a jury and there was a verdict and judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $2,000.00, to reverse which the defendant prosecutes this appeal.

Plaintiff filed his declaration which is a printed form of “payee versus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prestwood v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. ShoupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Perry v. Simpson Waterproof Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  4. Moynahan v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Kirchheimer v. BarrettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. RickertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Collura v. Board of Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. County Department of Public Welfare v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Feucht v. ClarkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. People v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API