Legal Opinion

Kubish v. State.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1935No. 17654PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

From a final judgment of a justice court forfeiting an appearance bond Emil Kubish, E.R. Rabel, Henry Billeck, C.C. Joplin and E.C. Nocek, appellants, have attempted to appeal directly to this court.

The power conferred by article 61, C.C.P., upon a justice of the peace to take forfeitures of all bail bonds given for the appearance of any party at his court, regardless of the amount, has been sustained by the civil courts. Garner v. Smith,40 Tex. 505; Fleming v. Bonine, 204 S.W. 364. Article 864, C.C. P., reads as follows: "An appeal may be taken by the defendant from every final judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jeter v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Muench v. OppenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ex Parte BennettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Garner v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Corey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Basaldua v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Basaldua v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2006
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API