In re the Arbitration between Chaindom Enterprises, Inc. & Furgang & Adwar, L.L.P.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*496Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered April 25, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, granted respondent’s cross motion to vacate that part of the award that declined to award interest and collection costs and remanded those issues to the arbitrator, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion denied.
We find no basis for vacatur of the portion of this arbitration award denying respondent collection costs and interest. The award did not violate strong public policy, was not irrational, and did not clearly exceed a specific limitation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hackett v. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Board of Education v. Arlington Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lynch v. BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ivanyi v. PotashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Mora v. Macquarie Holdings (USA) Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Mora v. Macquarie Holdings (USA) Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Beals v. New York City TransitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Gilman & Ciocia, Inc. v. MindesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.