Nebraska Ex Rel. Bruning v. United States Department of Interior
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentKornmann, District Judge
The majority opinion comprehensively and correctly sets out the history of this case. I have only one disagreement. I do not agree that we should give the federal government in this case yet another chance to “get it right.” The government has had quite enough chances to do that. I disagree with the conclusion that a remand is necessary. I believe we should affirm the action of the trial court, although based on some conclusions somewhat different from those of the district court. We are, of course, permitted to do that. The district court was correct in *514deciding that the decision of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Horras v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. United States Attorney for the Western District of MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
- Thomas v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.