Legal Opinion

State v. . Jacobs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1890PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Indictment for Murder, tried before Gilmer, J., and a jury, at May Term, 1889, of RobesoN Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Clake, J.:

When the case was called for trial, the other defendant, Oxendine, moved for a separate trial, and, at any rate, to be tried with one of the other defendants (there being several indicted in the same bill) rather than with defendant Jacobs. The Court remarked that it intended to try defendant Jacobs; that it had been informed by the jailor that he apprehended that Jacobs would escape if he had the opportunity. To this remark defendant Jacobs excepted. On motion of the Solicitor, Jacobs and Oxendine were tried together.

At common law, though the Judge, as is still the rule, could not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. State v. . LaxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. United States v. WhiteU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1826
  4. State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. . LippardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. LippardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . JacobsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Schwartzberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. State v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API