Legal Opinion · Concurrence

R.L.T. v. S.V.P.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 26, 1997No. 2960681Published

1ConcurrenceCrawley, Judge

The majority distinguishes this case feom State ex rel. G.M.F. v. W.F.F., [Ms. 2950647, December 6, 1996] — So.2d - (Ala.Civ. App.1996), and D.R.R. v. State ex rel. R.G., [Ms. 2951429, June 27, 1997] - So.2d - (Ala.Civ.App.1997), on the following facts: the mother has not admitted that R.L.T. was not the father of J.R.T. and blood' tests have not been conducted.

I agree that, based on those facts, this case is different from G.M.F. and D.R.R., although I do not think those differences constitute grounds for a legal distinction.

The same kind of evidence (the mother’s statement that the legal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. G.J. v. W.J.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. K.M. v. G.H.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. J.Z.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. K.W. v. State ex rel. S.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. State ex rel. A. T. v. E. W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API