Rosen v. Alexander
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.
Appellant in his brief represents this action was originally commenced by appellee Alexander as a Proceedings Supplementary against the other appellees. That appellant was granted permission to intervene as a party defendant.
Appellee Alexander in his answer brief asserts this is not true. He says certain of the appellees commenced this action by filing a petition in the trial court asking that court to recall and release an execution and fee bill which had been issued by the court. In his brief he sets out what purports to be a notice of the filing of said petition, the petition, and the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Public Service Commission v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Kelly v. RihmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Board of Commissioners v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Public Service Commission v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953