Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 2000No. 3D99-1160PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Clarification Granted

2Per curiam

The opinion of this Court filed on January 19,2000, is vacated and this opinion is substituted in its stead.

Upon the State’s Notice of Errata and Amended Response we reverse the trial court’s summary denial of defendant’s 3.850 motion, and remand the case to the trial court for hearing on the defendant’s claim that his plea was not voluntary and knowing due to English-Spanish language difficulties between him and his counsel. See Perez v. State, 449 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Additionally, defendant claims that his sentencing under chapter 95-184 violated…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API