Legal Opinion · Dissent

Homan v. Hughes

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 23, 1986No. 69556Published

1DissentOnion, Presiding Judge

I dissent to the handling of this entire matter. The Court of Criminal Appeals, essentially an appellate court, should use restraint in exercising its original jurisdiction. No question but what this Court may issue writs of mandamus regarding criminal law matters and to enforce its own jurisdiction. Article V, § 5, Texas Constitution; Article 4.04, V.A.C.C.P.; Broggi v. Curry, 571 S.W.2d 940 (Tex.Cr.App.1978). However, traditional rules govern the issuance of any writ of mandamus.1 Mandamus is an extraordinary writ and is never to be granted unless applicant (relator) proves a clear right to…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API