McDugle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Kenneth McDugle claims that the exclusion of the testimony of two police officers without an adequate Richardson hearing mandates reversal of his conviction for the sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school zone. We agree and reverse.
The state correctly observes that, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(d)(1), a defendant is required to furnish the prosecutor a written list of the names and addresses of all witnesses who the defendant expects to call as witnesses at trial. Further, there is a continuing duty to disclose. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.220(j). In the instant case, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- O'BRIEN v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Olson v. BlascoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016