Legal Opinion

Hardter v. Semel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff in accordance with the following Memorandum: We modify Supreme Court’s order by granting that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking to compel a further examination before trial of the nonparty witness, Dr. David Tyler. Because Dr. Tyler attended to the post-operative care and treatment of plaintiff’s decedent during the absence of his partner, defendant Dr. Semel, Dr. Tyler can be examined not only with respect to the circumstances of his care and treatment, but also may be required to give expert opinion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kavanaugh v. NussbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Fanelli v. AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Glass v. Rochester General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Cavezza v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Cruz v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Slapo v. Winthrop Univ. Hosp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Sciara v. Surgical Associates of Western New York, P.C.New York Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Diaz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API