Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 29, 1934No. 23896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Where a- certiorari is applied for after the expiration of the statutory period from the date of the judgment complained of, the petition should show on its face that it is a renewal of a previously dismissed certiorari sued out within the proper time in the same cause, and that the renewal is within six months from the date of the dismissal of the previous certiorari. Unless all of these facts appear in the petition for certiorari, the judge of the superior court has no jurisdiction of the case, and should refuse to sanction the petition; and if such a petition is sanctioned, it should be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barber v. City of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Morris v. BatteyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Force v. BatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. Richardson v. RectorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Sweat v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API