Malone v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
William L. Wharton has filed a petition asking to be relieved as counsel on appeal for appellant, Herbert Malone. A pro se motion has been filed by Malone seeking the same relief. Both parties explain that a conflict has developed between them such that Wharton can no longer serve as counsel. We deny the petition.
Arkansas R. Crim. P. Rule 36.26 states that an attorney has a duty to continue to represent a convicted defendant throughout any appeal unless permitted to withdraw by the trial court or this court “in the interest of justice or for other sufficient cause.”
The “interest of justice”…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Urquhart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brenk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999