Legal Opinion

American Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 28, 1928No. Docket Nos. 14702, 30751, 33212Published

1. The petitioner paid the capital stock taxes assessed against it by the State of Minnesota on the outstanding shares of its capital stock in the hands of its shareholders, charge such payments to expense, and did not withhold the amounts thereof from dividends due shareholders.

Read the full summary

1. The petitioner paid the capital stock taxes assessed against it by the State of Minnesota on the outstanding shares of its capital stock in the hands of its shareholders, charge such payments to expense, and did not withhold the amounts thereof from dividends due shareholders. Held, that in the circumstance herein the failure of the bank to collect the payments in question from dividends due its shareholders is in effect a distribution of surplus to such shareholders and is not an allowable deduction from petitioner's gross income, in either of the taxable years involved. 2. The petitioner…

1Opinion of the Court

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PAUL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

American Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 14702, 30751, 33212.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

14 B.T.A. 476; 1928 BTA LEXIS 2969;

November 28, 1928, Promulgated

1. The petitioner paid the capital stock taxes assessed against it by the State of Minnesota on the outstanding shares of its capital stock in the hands of its shareholders, charge such payments to expense, and did not withhold the amounts thereof from dividends due shareholders. Held, that in the circumstance herein the failure of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API