Legal Opinion

Welter v. Hill

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1896No. Nos. 9995-(254)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Clay county in favor of plaintiff for $1,092.52, after a trial before Baxter, J., and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

During all the time hereinafter stated one Bodkin was the owner of a certain farm in Clay county, in this state, on which he carried on the business of farming. On March 15, 1894, the Economist Plow Company recovered judgment against him for the sum of $2,102.26 in the district court of that county, and on August 2 of the same year caused execution to be issued thereon and levied on about 100 acres of growing flax which was being raised by Bodkin on this farm. This action was brought by plaintiff, claiming to be the owner of the flax, against the sheriff for the conversion of the same.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Restad v. EngemoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Day v. GravelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Gardner v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Griffin v. Minnesota Sugar CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. State v. MeehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Simpson v. PerfettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API