Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Striegel

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 11, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Savarese, S.

The executors have sought the counsel of this court to ascertain whether brothers and sisters of the half blood, or their representative, if they had predeceased testatrix, are entitled to share in a gift of the residue “ to be divided equally amongst my brothers and sisters.”

It would appear that there is no appellate authority squarely on this question within the State of New York. However, as a matter of common construction, in the absence of an expression of intention to the contrary, a testamentary phrase will be given the same meaning as ascribed to it under the laws of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baer v. HendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. In Re the Accounting of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. In re the Estate of AgrellaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  5. Yetter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of RobbinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API