Legal Opinion
Kahn v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees' & Bartenders International Union
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 3, 1977No. C-75-1903-CBRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
RENFREW, District Judge.
This is a class action brought under the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq., challenging the merger of five San Francisco union locals into one. Plaintiffs contend that defendants violated the terms of both the international union’s constitution and the bylaws and constitution of each of the local unions; that defendant officers failed to meet their fiduciary duties under § 501 of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. § 501 (“Title V”); and that defendants violated § 101(a)(1) and (2) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. § 411…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Calhoon v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brink v. DaLesioDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Kahn v. HOTEL & REST. EMP. & BARTENDERS, ETC.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Turner v. DempsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Local Union 575 of the United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting IndustryDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders Union, Local 2 v. National Labor Relations Board, and Lord Jim's, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.