Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Drexelius

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.

The plaintiff brings action pursuant to the Bulk Sales Act. (Pers. Prop. Law, § 44.) The defendants Ferdinand were at all times herein copartners in trade.

*372Plaintiff seeks to set aside a sale of a grocery and delicatessen store in the village of Williamsville, N. Y., made by defendants Ferdinand to the defendant Drexelius, by reason of the alleged failure of the parties to comply with the statute aforesaid. One of the two defendants Ferdinand furnished the buyer with a purported certificate under oath to the effect that it contained a fist of all the creditors of the grocery and delicatessen…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sternberg v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Willner Butter & Egg Corp. v. RothNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API