Commonwealth v. Head

The defendant challenges his conviction by a Brookline District Court jury for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of liquor (G. L. c. 90, § 24[1][a][1]).1 We see no merit in any of his arguments.

1. The defendant has failed to present an adequate record for reviewing his claim that the judge below erred in denying his “motion to dismiss [for] lack of jurisdiction” on the ground that *493the Brookline police performed an invalid extraterritorial stop and arrest in Boston just over the Brookline border.2 In particular, we have no transcript of the hearing. The motion judge’s…