Legal Opinion

Rush v. Browning

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1910No. 2203PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Original application by Rush to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus against Browning as district judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

Relator filed his petition in this court praying for a writ of mandamus to the Honorable J. N. Browning, judge of the District Court of Potter County, upon substantially the following statement of facts:

Belator executed to the First National Bank of Amarillo his promissory note for $12,000, in which he was joined by his wife. The note called for interest and for attorney’s fees in case of suit. The bank brought suit against the relator and his wife, in the District Court of Potter County, upon the note, to which relator made defense, and, upon agreement by the parties, took out a commission…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Depoyster v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crane v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hastings Oil Co. v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ralls v. RallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Southern Bag & Burlap Co. v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. First Nat. Bank of Amarillo v. RushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API