Legal Opinion

Rawson v. . Holland

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1875PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The defendant was a common carrier of the goods in question, from the city of New York to Detroit, Michigan. It received them at New York "to be forwarded to Detroit only," and the express terms of the undertaking exclude any inference or implication that it was to carry them further. But Detroit was not the final destination of the property. The box was marked "Day Lathrop, Dryden, Michigan, via Ridgway," clearly indicating that Dryden was the ultimate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Michaels v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Gibson v. CulverNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Nelson v. Hudson River RailroadCommission of Appeals · 1872
  5. Smith v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1803

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Grand Trunk RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Pratt v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. State Board of Education v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Davis v. Jacksonville Southeastern LineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API