Legal Opinion

Michalek v. Shumate

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 1987No. 86-2085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant, Gerald G. Michalek, plaintiff below, appeals the final summary judgment for appellees, David E. and June Shu-mate, defendants below. The trial court held that the doctrine of dangerous instrumentality did not apply and therefore ap-pellees were not liable to appellant for injuries he received when his vehicle was struck by a car owned by appellees. We affirm.

The pertinent, undisputed facts show that at the time of the collision, appellees’ car was being operated by an employee of Ralph’s Car Cleaning. Appellee June Shu-mate had called Ralph’s Car Cleaning for an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Susco Car Rental System of Florida v. LeonardSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Florida Power and Light Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  4. Albritton v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michalek v. ShumateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Hernandez v. Hertz Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API