Legal Opinion

Hoff v. Lodi Canning Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1921No. Civ. No. 2175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action was to recover $2,704.73, the balance claimed to be due for a quantity of tomatoes sold by plaintiff to defendant. On February 11, 1918, the parties entered into a written contract providing for the sale and purchase of all the tomatoes to be grown that year by plaintiff and fixing the price at twelve dollars per ton, but the concluding clause of said agreement was: “If Stockton or Sacramento price is more than twelve dollars buyer agrees to pay same advance.” Defendant in its answer claimed that prior to any delivery an oral agreement was entered into under the terms of which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sloan v. . BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Frazier v. Ebenezer Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Refining Co. v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Application of MoranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API