Legal Opinion

Pitts v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1918No. 811PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Question certified by Court of Appeals (Case No. 9440).

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

The Court of Appeals certified to the Supreme Court the following question: “Is bigamy, under the peculiar language of our statute (Penal Code 1910, § 367), a continuing offense so long as the person who has committed it continues 'in knowingly having a plurality of husbands or wives at the same time,’ so that a prosecution therefor is not barred by the statute of limitations if it be commenced within four years of such 'having,’ although not within four years of the second or unlawful marriage ceremony?”

1. “Indictments may be found and filed in the proper courts as follows: 1. For murder, at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beggs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. State v. SloanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Nelms v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. King v. City of HazlehurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herrin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Pitts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API