Legal Opinion

In re Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by Jasper B. Tarbox and others, creditors of John H. Miller, an insolvent debtor, from an order of the district court for Washington county, McCluer, J., presiding, directing that the assets of the insolvent be distributed among those of his creditors who should file releases as required by law.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Upon the hearing of an order to- show cause why the proceeds of the estate of the insolvent, Miller, should not be distributed by his assignee among such of his creditors as filed releases of their claims in the manner provided by Laws 1881, c. 148, § 10, these appellants, creditors of the insolvent, filed a petition and complaint alleging that he had fraudulently concealed, -or fraudulently incumbered or disposed of, his property, with intent to cheat and defraud his creditors. Subsequently such testimony as the appellants saw fit to produce was taken before a referee, and returned to and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GazettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re ShotwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API