Legal Opinion
Buda v. Foley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 28, 1939PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The plaintiff in the first case seeks to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained when the automobile in which she was riding was in collision, from the rear, with the automobile that was being operated by the defendant. The plaintiff’s husband seeks to recover for consequential damages in the second case. The jury found for the plaintiffs. The cases were tried to a jury upon the report of an auditor, whose findings of fact were not final, and other evidence. The only finding of the auditor as to how the collision occurred was that the Buda automobile was proceeding in a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Falk v. FinkelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- McDonough v. VozzelaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Jennings v. BragdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Morrison v. MedagliaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Plummer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Remy v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Olofson v. KilgallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Frazier v. CordialinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Mazukna v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Moran v. Plymouth Rubber Co. Mutual Benefit Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.