Legal Opinion

Barton-Mansfield Co. v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1935No. 4-3779PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellant, Barton-Man sfield Company, brought suit in the Lawrence Circuit Court against appellees, Roy and Katherine Richardson, to enforce a materialman’s lien on lots 1 and 2, block 55, Gibson & Boas Addition to Hoxie, Arkansas. A lien had been filed within the time allowed by law.

On motion of the appellees, the case was transferred to chancery court, and appellees filed answer and cross-complaint. On June 3, 1934, a decree was entered in favor of the appellant against the appellees for the sum of $37.50, together with costs, including $25 f-or appellant’s attorney, to be taxed as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forsgren v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Gordon v. ReevesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  5. State Use Calhoun County v. PooleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Midwest Lime Co. v. Independence County Chancery CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Rinke v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API