Estate of Harris v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
The estate of Rosalie M. Harris (Estate) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) holding that the Estate was not eligible to pursue a claim for specific loss benefits on account of Harris’ permanent injury that occurred before her death. Affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), the Board reasoned that Harris, while alive, was eligible to pursue a specific loss benefit for the amputation of her leg but this eligibility did not survive her death by transfer to the Estate. We affirm.
The facts, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Czap v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Reed v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morocho v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Home Equity Renovations, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Arnold v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Allegheny Power Service Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Scott v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Allegheny Power Service Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.