People v. Santorelli
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of Monroe County Court should be reversed and the informations dismissed.
Defendants’ claim that Penal Law § 245.01 offends the Equal Protection Clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions was expressly passed upon by County Court, and its disposition of that claim was a necessary basis for its order of reversal of the Rochester City Court which had dismissed the informations (see, People v Craft, 149 Misc 2d 223 [Monroe County Ct]; People v Craft, 134 Misc 2d 121 [Rochester City Ct]). We, therefore, reject the People’s argument that under CPL 470.35…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Childs v. ChildsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. CraftRochester City Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Free the Nipple-Fort Collins v. City of Fort CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Spencer Tunick v. Howard Safir, in His Official Capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- State v. CastanedaNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. ArthurMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- State v. VogtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.