Gilliam v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.
The appellant assigns as error the overruling by the court of its motion for directed verdict, which was made at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close °f all the evidence. It is the appellant’s contention that, under the record, the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, as a matter of law, or that the evidence fails to establish his freedom from contributory negligence. For the determination of this question, we turn to the record, and it is incumbent upon us to give to the testimony of the appellee the most favorable construction that can fairly be placed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Landis v. Inter-Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Powers v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Frederickson v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Albright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Meyer v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Hitchcock v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Southern Ry. Co. v. WhaleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
- Lauman v. DearminSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Lynch v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.