Legal Opinion

Lang v. Lutz

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided October 28, 2003No. 2002-CA-00054-COAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. This case involves a dispute between sisters over their mother and her estate. The trial court ruled against the appellants, Margaret Loyd Lang and Clyde Lang. Aggrieved, Margaret perfected an appeal to this Court and asserts the following issues:

I. THE CHANCELLOR ERRED BY FINDING THAT APPELLANT MARGARET LANG PROCURED HER OFFICE OF TRUST THROUGH UNDUE INFLUENCE AND FURTHER ERRED BY REMOVING HER AS TRUSTEE.

II. THE CHANCELLOR ERRED BY FINDING THE TEMPORARY SUPPORT TO BE UNREASONABLE.

III. THE CHANCELLOR ERRED BY FINDING APPELLANT LANG TO HAVE VIOLATED HER FIDUCIARY…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McNeil v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dethlefs v. Beau Maison Development Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Croft v. AlderMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Murray v. LairdMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hall v. WoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Smith v. Smith (In re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2013
  2. Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Jordan v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
  4. Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API