Legal Opinion

People v. Satek

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 18, 1979No. 78-251PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant, James C. Satek, was indicted for armed robbery. The trial court suppressed certain testimony of James Poghen, Jr., a prospective witness for the State in the defendant’s trial, after finding that the testimony was obtained in violation of the Illinois eavesdropping statute. The evidence in this record indicates that Poghen participated in the robbery with the defendant. The State appeals the suppression of Poghen’s testimony.

The portions of the Illinois eavesdropping statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 14 —…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. People v. RobbinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. The PEOPLE v. MaslowskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. GervasiIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Abbott v. Village of Winthrop HarborDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. In Re Cook County Grand JuryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. People v. GervasiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API