Legal Opinion
Larme Estates, Inc. v. Omnichrome Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
Plaintiff sues to recover damages accruing subsequent to September 15, 1935, by virtue of an alleged unlawful discharge on that date of Joseph S. Friedman, its assignor, under a contract between him and one Von Fraunhofer. The latter assigned the contract to the defendant, who assumed all its terms and conditions.
A prior action was brought in the City Court by Friedman against this defendant and the Photo-Chemical and Dye Corporation (hereinafter called Photo-Chemical). The latter was an affiliate of the present defendant, and Friedman’s services had been assigned to it for a limited period.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Canfield v. Elmer E. Harris & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Kreitner v. BurgwegerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ripley v. StorerNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Sullivan v. International Fidelity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. Dean Construction Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Abinet v. MediavillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Larme Estates, Inc. v. Omnichrome Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.